This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gustafson, J. P. Articles by Wright, M. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cooperative and Clashing Interests in Small Groups. Part I. Theory

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, B6-276 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792.

Lowell Cooper

California School of Professional Psychology

Nancy Coalter Lathrop

Karin Ringler

Fredric A. Seldin

Marcia Kahn Wright

University of Wisconsin

Exploitation is as old as our knowledge of society and recurs continually in almost every social organization that we know, while cooperation is less common, more private, and continually breaking down. The authors are interested in routes that small groups discover for running against this exploitative current of history. The ordinary danger in new small groups is that divergent interests will be neither recognized nor balanced. Members will have contradictory plans for the use of the group situation, often unconscious, which are managed by ignoring or negating one or both parties. The authors have found, however, that groups are also capable of unconcious collective planning to handle these collisions. They describe five major principles of unconscious group planning, illustrate these principles in the narratives of two contrasting small groups, and compare this new theory with the classical perspectives on small-group dynamics.

Human Relations, Vol. 34, No. 4, 315-339 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678103400405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Jarboe and H. R. Witteman Intragroup Conflict Management in Task-Oriented Groups: The Influence of Problem Sources and Problem Analyses Small Group Research, May 1, 1996; 27(2): 316 - 338. [Abstract]

				H. Wiiteman Group Member Satisfaction: A Conflict-Related Account Small Group Research, February 1, 1991; 22(1): 24 - 58. [Abstract]

				V. D. Wall JR and L. L. Nolan Small Group Conflict: A Look at Equity, Satisfaction, and Styles of Conflict Management Small Group Research, May 1, 1987; 18(2): 188 - 211. [Abstract]

				D. Rubinstein and R. W. Woodman Spiderman and the Burma Raiders: Collateral Organization Theory in Action Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, January 1, 1984; 20(1): 1 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Cooper and J. P. Gustafson Family-Group Development: Planning in Organizations Human Relations, August 1, 1981; 34(8): 705 - 730. [PDF]