This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (24) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thornton, B. Articles by Johnson, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Perception of the Rape Victim's Culpability: The Influence of Respondents' Personal-Environmental Causal Attribution Tendencies

Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469.

Michael A. Robbins

Joel A. Johnson

University of Maine at Orono

This study investigated the influence of individual differences in attributional tendencies on the perception of a rape victim's causal role in her own vicitmization. Respondents'general tendency to attribute cause of events in another person's life to either personal, internal reasons or external, environmental ones was assessed, as were their attitudes to a variety of items on the subject of rape. Factor analysis of the rape questionnaire produced four factors: victim precipitation-responsibility, negative evaluation, sexual motivation, and power motivation. With the victim precipitation-responsibility factor serving as a measure of attributed responsibility, a factorial design was created with sex of subject and attributional propensity serving as independent measures. Males perceived significantly greater precipitation-responsibility on the part of a rape victim than did female respondents. There was also a significant overall trend for attributional orientation with "personals" indicating greater victim responsibility than that expressed by "environmentals." This effect was particularly evident among male subjects, while females did not significantly differ among themselves. Neither attributional nor sex differences were apparent in analyses of the evaluative or motivational factors.

Human Relations, Vol. 34, No. 3, 225-237 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678103400304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Anderson, H. Cooper, and L. Okamura Individual Differences and Attitudes Toward Rape: A Meta-Analytic Review Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1997; 23(3): 295 - 315. [Abstract]

				R. C. DAVIS and E. BRICKMAN Supportive and Unsupportive Aspects of the Behavior of Others Toward Victims of Sexual and Nonsexual Assault J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1996; 11(2): 250 - 262. [Abstract]

				K. K. P. Johnson Attributions about Date Rape: Impact of Clothing, Sex, Money Spent, Date Type, and Perceived Similarity Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, March 1, 1995; 23(3): 292 - 310. [Abstract]

				M. A. WHATLEY and R. E. RIGGIO Gender Differences in Attributions of Blame for Male Rape Victims J Interpers Violence, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 502 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. BEST, B. S. DANSKY, and D. G. KILPATRICK Medical Students' Attitudes About Female Rape Victims J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1992; 7(2): 175 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Lewis and K. K.P. Johnson Effect of Dress, Cosmetics, Sex of Subject, and Causal Inference on Attribution of Victim Responsibility1 Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, September 1, 1989; 8(1): 22 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Thornton and R. M. Ryckman The Influence of a Rape Victim's Physical Attractiveness on Observers' Attributions of Responsibility Human Relations, June 1, 1983; 36(6): 549 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Thornton, R. M. Ryckman, and M. A. Robbins The Relationships of Observer Characteristics to Beliefs in the Causal Responsibility of Victims of Sexual Assault Human Relations, April 1, 1982; 35(4): 321 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]