Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shambaugh, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Development of the Small Group

Philip Wells Shambaugh

Harvard Medical School; 77 Pond Avenue, Brookline, Massachusetts 02146.

The literature of small group development is vast but, despite two recent reviews, theoretically inconclusive. This article summarizes a selection of prominent theories representative of the field, clustering them around three related models, a recurring phase model, a sequential phase model, and a changing leadership model. A conceptual synthesis is then presented using two related dimensions, the fluctuating psychological closeness of the members as they approach individuation and the stepwise generation of the group's culture. It is suggested that groups evolve through a series of stable structures separated by phases of hostility and narcissism as the leader, or later the culture, fails to satisfy the needs of the group.

Human Relations, Vol. 31, No. 3, 283-295 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001872677803100306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
L. E. McMorris, N. H. Gottlieb, and G. G. Sneden
Developmental Stages in Public Health Partnerships: A Practical Perspective
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2005; 6(2): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
P. W. Shambaugh
The Mythic Structure of Bion's Groups
Human Relations, October 1, 1985; 38(10): 937 - 951.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
D. Weinholtz and C. P. Friedman
Conducting Qualitative Studies Using Theory and Previous Research: A Study Reexamined
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1985; 8(2): 149 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. P. Hare and D. Naveh
Group Development At Camp David Summit, 1978
Small Group Research, August 1, 1984; 15(3): 299 - 318.
[Abstract]