This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (44) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by O'Reilly, C. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Intentional Distortion of Information in Organizational Communication: A Laboratory and Field Investigation

Graduate School of Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90024.

This report summarizes the results of several laboratory andfield studies in-vestigating antecedents to and consequences of the intentional distortion of information by senders in organizational communication networks. Lab-oratory studies were used to examine the impact of two interpersonal vari-ables (trust in the receiver, perceived influence of the receiver over the sender) and directionality of information flow (upward, lateral, and down-ward) on senders' propensities to block or suppress information. Field studies were used to establish the external validity of the laboratory investi-gations and to relate information distortion by senders to job satisfaction and performance. Results of these studies demonstrate that (1) a bias exists towards screening certain types of information from upward transmission; (2) low trust in the receiver of a message results in significantly more sup-pression by senders of information, especially information which reflects unfavorably on the senders; and (3) a measure of information distortion is significantly and inversely associated with job satisfaction and individual and group performance. Results of these studies differ in several respects from previous studies of organizational communication. Implications of the results reported here for decision-making are discussed and a model relating antecedents and consequences to information distortion is pre-sented.

Human Relations, Vol. 31, No. 2, 173-193 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001872677803100205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-F. Chou, A.-C. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, M.-P. Huang, and B.-S. Cheng Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness Human Relations, December 1, 2008; 61(12): 1713 - 1742. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Haas Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments Management Science, August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1170 - 1184. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. D. Scott Just(?) a True-False Test: Applying Signal Detection Theory to Judgments of Organizational Dishonesty Business Society, June 1, 2006; 45(2): 130 - 148. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Rau The Influence of Relationship Conflict and Trust on the Transactive Memory: Performance Relation in Top Management Teams Small Group Research, December 1, 2005; 36(6): 746 - 771. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-T. Wong, C.-S. Wong, H.-Y. Ngo, and H.-K. Lui Different responses to job insecurity of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises Human Relations, November 1, 2005; 58(11): 1391 - 1418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Burgess What Motivates Employees to Transfer Knowledge Outside Their Work Unit? Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2005; 42(4): 324 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Ipe Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework Human Resource Development Review, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 337 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. T. Hansen Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies Organization Science, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 232 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. T. Dirks and D. L. Ferrin The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings Organization Science, July 1, 2001; 12(4): 450 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. W. Christensen and J. R. Bailey A Source Accessibility Effect on Media Selection Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1997; 10(3): 373 - 387. [Abstract]

				J. M. Whitfield, B. T. Lamont, and V. Sambamurthy The Effects of Organization Design on Media Richness in Multinational Enterprises Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1996; 10(2): 209 - 226. [Abstract]

				J. J. McMillan and N. A. Northern Organizational Codependency: The Creation and Maintenance of Closed Systems Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1995; 9(1): 6 - 45. [Abstract]

				A. A. Felts Organizational Communication: A Critical Perspective Administration Society, February 1, 1992; 23(4): 495 - 513. [Abstract]

				K. E. Weick The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster Journal of Management, September 1, 1990; 16(3): 571 - 593. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bialaszewski and M. Giallourakis Perceived Communication Skills and Resultant Trust Perceptions Within the Channel of Distribution Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, March 1, 1985; 13(2): 206 - 217.

				M. J. Glauser Upward Information Flow in Organizations: Review and Conceptual Analysis Human Relations, August 1, 1984; 37(8): 613 - 643. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Gaines Upward Communication in Industry: An Experiment Human Relations, December 1, 1980; 33(12): 929 - 942. [Abstract] [PDF]