Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (42)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robey, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Computers and Management Structure: Some Empirical Findings Re-examined

Daniel Robey

Division of Management, School of Business and Organizational Sciences, Florida International University, Tamiami Trail, Miami, Florida 33199

This paper re-examines empirical literature which relates computerization to organization structure. Explanations are sought for the conflicting findings regarding the effects of computer adoption on centralization and decentralization. A review of the literature suggests that: (1) computers do not cause changes in the degree of delegation, (2) computerized systems are sufficiently flexible to facilitate either centralized or decentralized structures, and (3) the degree of delegation in these studies is related to task environmental conditions of the organizations studied. Certain conceptual and methodological issues pertaining to this line of research are discussed, including the meaning of centralization, the perceptual bias in interviewing affected managers, the lack of adequate effectiveness measures in most studies, and the very basic problem of treating computerization as a variable. Further research on computerization should focus away from the present confining framework to look at environmental conditions as the more likely determinants of structural variation.

Human Relations, Vol. 30, No. 11, 963-976 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/001872677703001101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
D. Robey and M.-C. Boudreau
Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications
Information Systems Research, June 1, 1999; 10(2): 167 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. P. Mangaliso
The Strategic Usefulness of Management Information as Perceived by Middle Managers
Journal of Management, April 1, 1995; 21(2): 231 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
F. Check-Teck
Culture, Productivity and Structure: A Singapore Study
Organization Studies, January 1, 1992; 13(4): 589 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
V. Chandrasekar
An Investigation Into the Conditions of Hotel Front Office Automation: an Organizational Approach
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, January 1, 1988; 12(1): 31 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
H. S. Atiyyah
Computer Impacts on Saudi Arabian Public Bureaucracy
Organization Studies, January 1, 1988; 9(4): 511 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. L. Markus and D. Robey
The Organizational Validity of Management Information Systems
Human Relations, March 1, 1983; 36(3): 203 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]