Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

How Psychologically Dangerous are T-Groups and Encounter Groups?

Cary L. Cooper

A number of people involved in the field of group training have suggested that Sensitivity Training (or T-groups as they are commonly called in Europe) and Encounter Groups may be 'counter-productive', 'disrupt ongoing personality functions', and 'encourage inappropriate levels of intimacy which may destroy rewarding psychological relationships with other people' (Mann, 1970: Crawshaw, 1969). That is, that this form of training is potentially dangerous and may have psychologically disturbing consequences for participants. Until recently the claims and counter-claims with respect to this issue have consisted primarily of opinions and inference drawn from limited or circumscribed experience (i.e., 'I knew a person once who attended a T-group...' vs. 'In my many years of training T-groups and Encounter Groups, I have never known a single case of...') Some empirical research is now being conducted to evaluate in a more systematic and controlled way this important issue. The magnitude of the problem can be seen in the steadily increasing numbers of people attending such groups (Smith, 1971). The purpose of this article is to examine the available evidence in an effort to assess the current state of research and to encourage and focus future research work in this area.

Human Relations, Vol. 28, No. 3, 249-260 (1975)
DOI: 10.1177/001872677502800304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
C. J. Roussin
Increasing Trust, Psychological Safety, and Team Performance Through Dyadic Leadership Discovery
Small Group Research, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 224 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
C. L. Cooper
Risk Factors in Experiential Learning Groups
Small Group Research, August 1, 1980; 11(3): 251 - 278.



Home page
Human RelationsHome page
R. E. Kaplan, S. L. Obert, and W. R. Van Buskirk
The Etiology of Encounter Group Casualties: "Second Facts"
Human Relations, February 1, 1980; 33(2): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]